Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

John Romano: Why the stammering over Norquist's pledge?

They dodge. They feint. They parry. They limbo, lambada and merengue.

It seems a growing number of lawmakers will do whatever contortions are necessary to avoid answering questions about their devotion to conservative activist Grover Norquist's tax pledge.

Seriously, is the question really that hard?

Either you believe taxes should not be raised under any circumstance as the pledge indicated when you signed it, or you no longer subscribe to this ridiculously intractable position. It should be a simple yes or no.

Now I will grant you that a handful of senators have publicly blown off Norquist and his whiny attempts at intimidation. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is one. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia is another. Every few days, someone new seems willing to step out of the dance line.

But as the fiscal cliff rapidly approaches, too many legislators want to pretend the pledge was just some postcard they signed when the economy was looking flush.

A House member from Georgia now says he viewed the pledge as more of a statement of philosophy than a promise. Several have said they thought the pledge had an expiration date, as if it were Twinkies. Marco Rubio swears his views have nothing to do with the pledge, which raises the question of why he ever signed it.

At this point, I'm not sure which is worse: swearing fealty to a lobbyist in the first place, or not having the courage to either embrace or disavow him now that it has become inconvenient.

Around here, both U.S. Rep. C.W. Bill Young, R-Indian Shores, and U.S. Rep Gus Bilirakis, R-Palm Harbor, have signed the Norquist pledge.

I called both of their offices Friday morning to ask about their views on the budget and the president's insistence on a tax increase for those making more than $250,000.

I'm sure my phone will ring any minute now.

Young, to his credit, did appear as scheduled at the Suncoast Tiger Bay Club luncheon Friday afternoon. Not surprisingly, the Norquist pledge was the first question he heard. He did such a fine job of avoiding the topic, it was also the second question he heard.

Young eventually seemed to say he might support a tax increase as long as spending cuts were part of the deal, an entirely defensible position.

But along the way he hemmed and hawed, and made it sound as if he had barely paid attention to a pledge that conservatives have praised for 20 years.

What is disappointing is Young never needed Norquist's blessing. And he's been around long enough to know that blind devotion to any policy is simply foolish.

The last time tax increases were on the table was during Bill Clinton's first term in 1993 when Young was one of 175 Republicans in the House. They voted 175-0 against it.

Yet, a decade earlier, Young did vote for tax increases that Ronald Reagan introduced during his first term. Nearly 54 percent of the Republicans in the House voted for that 1982 budget, along with 51 percent of the Democrats.

Back then, lawmakers seemed to understand nuance and compromise. They seemed more willing to vote their conscience instead of what lobbyists and donors were demanding. They seemed to care more about the country than their parties.

Here's an idea:

Why not sign a pledge to that effect?

John Romano: Why the stammering over Norquist's pledge? 12/08/12 [Last modified: Saturday, December 8, 2012 8:17pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Report: Trump asked intel chiefs to push back against FBI collusion probe after Comey revealed its existence

    National

    President Donald Trump asked two of the nation's top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government, the Washington Post reports, citing current and former officials.

    From  left, CIA Director Mike Pompeo; Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats; and National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers take their seats on Capitol Hill on May 11 before  testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on major threats facing the U.S. [Associated Press]
  2. Trump asked intelligence chiefs to push back against FBI collusion probe after Comey revealed its existence

    National

    President Donald Trump asked two of the nation's top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government, current and former officials said, according to the Washington Post.

    After President Donald Trump fired James Comey, shown here, as FBI director, the Washington Post is reporting, Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election.
  3. For Gov. Rick Scott, 'fighting' could mean vetoing entire state budget

    State Roundup

    Every day, Gov. Rick Scott is getting a lot of advice.

    The last time a Florida governor vetoed the education portion of the state budget was in 1983. Gov. Bob Graham blasted fellow Democrats for their “willing acceptance of mediocrity.”
  4. Romano: Time is up chief, make a call on police body cameras

    Crime

    Excuse me chief, but it's time to take a stand.

    St. Petersburg police Chief Tony Holloway
  5. Potential new laws further curb Floridians' right to government in the Sunshine

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — From temporarily shielding the identities of murder witnesses to permanently sealing millions of criminal and arrest records, state lawmakers did more this spring than they have in all but one of the past 22 years to chip away at Floridians' constitutional guarantees to access government records and …

    The Legislature passed 17 new exemptions to the Sunshine Law, according to a tally by the First Amendment Foundation.